Advisian completes advisory project for acquisition of largest US district energy business
Our Power Americas Consulting team continues to establish its strong reputation, building on previous transactional advisory project successes.
Sort by: Relevance | Date
Edit Search
Our Power Americas Consulting team continues to establish its strong reputation, building on previous transactional advisory project successes.
Advisian recently signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with Shale Crescent USA to help attract and encourage energy-intensive industries to make use of readily available natural resources and create synergies with local, regional, and state economic development organizations.
Our CEO, Andrew Wood, joins several leaders from across the Worley organization to share insights and expertise at Gastech 2019 from 17-19 September in Houston, Texas.
The Houston OpEx Summit (5-7 Nov 2018) will bring together over 300 Operations, OE, Risk Management, EH&S, Asset Management and Reliability leaders to learn the latest strategies for managing change, increasing efficiency, and optimizing productivity- without compromising reliability, safety, and compliance.
Advisian has been selected to develop the Strategic Infrastructure and Land Plan for Western Australia’s Marine Complex (AMC) and Henderson Precinct. The plan will identify ways to grow WA’s defence industry and become a key sector in the local economy.
Advisian is helping Element 25 explore a novel approach to deliver the energy-intensive electrowinning process through the use of intermittent, dynamic renewable energy.
Based on our tried and tested experience and expertise, we offer ‘parental advice’ related to ongoing asset management of FPSOs and associated subsea facilities, many of which are relatively young.
Despite a decades-long focus on project management skills, systems, and discipline, a work backlog of unmet asset needs is growing, requiring ever more time and money. In the first of this three-part series, Stuart Elliot shares why it’s time to reframe the problem, and how we can change the game.
Many organizations do not understand the difference between performance-based and prescriptive-based specifications. In the fourth part of this six-part series, Adam Boughton explains what each is and how they can ultimately affect project risks and outcomes.
In part two of this six-part series, Adam Boughton discusses Golden Rule #2, understanding the balance between “Innovative Benefits” vs. “Innovative Risk.” How do you tackle the challenge of knowing when you should choose to be an innovation leader versus an innovation laggard for any given project?